[annotation] ISS for hydrophobicity
Karen Christie
kchris at genome.Stanford.EDU
Tue Aug 28 11:34:50 PDT 2007
Hi Doug,
At the Jan 07 GO meeting we did agree to require that the with column be
filled for ISS.
We also agreed that it would be allowed to put the name of a method in the
with field. My example at the time was various snoRNA predictions based on
sequence. However, we have not yet worked out the specifics of how to be
able to include names of methods in the with column.
I am writing up a summary of the issue to send to the GO list to start the
discussion before I go on maternity leave (last day working till next year
will be Sept 14), so if you send me the paper and the specifics of what
you would like to be able to annotate from the paper, I'll include it in
my item.
thanks,
-Karen
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Doug howe wrote:
> I want to annotate to 'integral to membrane' based on the authors citing
> hydrophobicity analysis and concluding that it is a transmembrane protein. I
> know we have discussed this before...
> What is the current policy on this annotation? ISS using nothing in the
> 'with' field (this appears to be disallowed at the moment)?
> -Doug
>
More information about the Annotation
mailing list