[Annotation] [Biocurator] possible data submission at publication model

[Alan Ruttenberg]

If there is no control on the vocabulary, is it intended that someone  
on the journal staff curate these, or are you suggesting that they be  
published, as is, and the picked up by external curators.
-Alan

On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Judith Blake wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Here's a mock-up of what we are starting to present to some  
> journals.  I would appreciate any feedback.  these are just some  
> screen shots with no commentary, but you can see where this is  
> going I think.  It would be melded into the publication process  
> somewhere.  One thing to notice is that there is no requirement for  
> cho0sing any particular term for the annotation.  It justs asks for  
> what the author would propose.  The idea is that it would be up to  
> the curator to use this as appropriate in the curation of the paper  
> particularly as a clue to what the author is thinking.
>
> One thing of course is that as 'author submission' forms, there  
> would be no pubmed ID yet.   Also, we may swap the GO taxon table  
> for a MOD taxon table...really meant to reflect the most common  
> taxonIDs for the work published in that journal.
>
> notice that if you want to add data for more than one gene, you  
> click at the bottom and a new annotation table opens from the same  
> form.  You can choose for a different taxon here if you want to.
>
> I would welcome any comments.
>
> Judy<JournalMetadataSubmission.ppt>___________________________________ 
> ____________
> Biocurator mailing list
> Biocurator at tairgroup.org
> http://mailman.tairgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/biocurator