[Annotation] check for ND + additional annotation

[Stacia Engel]

the gene in question was a yeast gene, CWC23.  there is ND to generic  
BP because we have no experimental data for that gene.

the gene has computational annotations from both UniProtKB and  
bioPIXIE.  at SGD, we don't remove NDs to root nodes when only  
computational annotations exist.

stacia


On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Judith Blake wrote:

> Typically, I think this should be done at the time of generating  
> the annotation...even an IEA.  Each group might consider  
> implementing something to QC this, but a QC at the time of  
> submission of data file to AmiGO would be good too.
>
> Judy
>
>
>
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We received a query on the GO Help list from a user who noticed a  
>> gene that was annotated to both the biological process (BP) root  
>> with ND, and annotated to a non-root BP term with another evidence  
>> code. I agreed with him that it doesn't make sense to keep the ND/ 
>> root annotation if a "real"
>> annotation could be made to a term in the same ontology. Would it  
>> be worthwhile to add a check for cases like this, perhaps in  
>> Mike's script?
>>
>> cheers,
>> midori
>> _______________________________________________
>> Annotation mailing list
>> Annotation at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/annotation
> _______________________________________________
> Annotation mailing list
> Annotation at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/annotation