[Annotation] [Fwd: Re: how come we don't have a set contributed?]

[Judith Blake]

Amelia,
yes you are right about that.  So maybe ok since not complete document 
that was altered as before.  A bit of a false concern maybe on my part.
judy

Amelia Ireland wrote:
>
> Back in Gotham City on 8 Sep 2008, at 10:02, Judith Blake wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> in my various perusals, I came across the marked up documents as 
>> examples of annotation tasks.  The sense here is that we need 
>> permissions from copyright owners to post such documents.  Did we get 
>> that?
>
>
> I removed the links to the marked up PDFs after Evelyn / Harold 
> mentioned about the copyright issue, because AFAIK, no one had applied 
> to authors for permission to show the papers in an altered form. 
> Currently the sample annotation sets consist of plain text or doc 
> files with extracts from papers, not the full text. Perhaps this kind 
> of material should be moved somewhere else entirely anyway, as it's 
> too detailed for a casual visitor to the GO website; it's really more 
> suited for some kind of annotation tutorial.
>
> -- 
> Amelia Ireland
> GO Editorial Office
> http://www.ebi.ac.uk || http://www.berkeleybop.org
> BBOP Plant Project: http://bbopgarden.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>