two questions from March 19 obol

[J Clark]

> 
> Very informative! 

Thank you :-)

> I suspect that the obol suggestion is based on the
> higher-up development terms, where 'morphogenesis' is_a 'development'.

Oh yes I see what you mean. That does seem likely.
I think it would be much easier for obol if we had a way of 
marking the fact that the exact syonym in this case is the 
one that obol ought to be looking at, rather than the term 
name.

Do you think that could go in the consortium meeting aganda? 
It would make life a lot easier if we could do that.

Jen



-- 
EMBL - European Bioinformatics Institute,
Gene Ontology Consortium,
and Wolfson College, Cambridge.
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~jclark/