Organ number: input needed please
Tanya Berardini
tberardi at acoma.Stanford.EDU
Mon May 22 11:23:19 PDT 2006
Hi Development groupies,
Jen, Suparna and I have been struggling with a couple of development
terms and I'd appreciate your input to help us resolve it. I've also
posted this on the SF item but since you're not all likely to be
following the planty terms, you're getting an extra special email from
me.
Gory details:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=1438331&group_id=36855&atid=440764
Short summary: Wt Arabidopsis flowers are radially symmetric and have
4 petals. There are Arabidopsis mutants that have fewer petals than
the wt. There are also Arabidopsis mutants that have more petals that
the wt. How do we represent the processes that the gene products are
involved in?
Current proposed structure:
[i]pattern specification GO:0007389
---[i] determination of organ number; NEW
------[i]determination of floral organ number; NEW
---------[i] determination of petal number ; NEW
---[i] flower development GO:0009908
------[p]determination of floral organ number ; NEW
---------[i] determination of petal number; NEW
------[i] petal formation GO:0048451
------------[p] determination of petal number; NEW
------------[p] petal development; NEW
But these terms are still too general. What I'd like to add are terms
like:
[i[ determination of petal number; NEW
--[p] regulation of petal number; NEW
----[i] negative regulation of petal number; NEW
----[i] positive regulation of petal number; NEW
Any objections to this (last) set of terms? I'd much rather have these
strings than 'regulation of determination of petal number' or
'regulation of petal number determination'.
You can respond in return to this email and I'll add it to the SF item
or you can post directly to the SF item.
Thanks for your time,
Tanya
More information about the Development
mailing list