[go] a perspective on use and misuse of GO annotations

[Suzanna Lewis]

Is this the much anticipated response to the GO-error-rate paper that  
we were discussing last summer? I hope so. In either case I'll  
provide some comments.

-S

On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Sue Rhee wrote:

> Hi GO consortium,
>
> I have been commissioned to write a perspective on the use and  
> misuse of
> GO annotations by Nature Review Genetics and have collaborated
> intensively with Sorin Draghichi, Val Wood, and Kara Dolinski on the
> writing of this manuscript in the past year. We have a close to a  
> final
> version that we would love to get some feedback from you. It's about
> 6500 words and needs to be shortened to about 3500-4500 words. In
> addition to acknowledging the whole GO consortium, we'll acknowledge
> anyone who provide feedback on the ms. Chris Mungall has already
> provided some good feedback and it would be great to get more views  
> from
> others in the group.
>
> Please send me your edits/comments by next Thurs, December 20th. I  
> will
> try to submit it right before X-mas.
>
> Thanks and happy holidays,
> Sue
>
> -- 
> Sue Rhee
> Staff Scientist
> Carnegie Institution, Department of Plant Biology
> 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305
> Email: (650) 325-1521 x251
> Fax: (650) 325-6857
>
> <Figures-and-Tables-v3.doc><NRG-review8.doc>