[go] AmiGO beta announcement

[Michael Ashburner]

Yes I agree Michelle, it is a subset, NOT a slim.

Michael
On 18 Dec 2007, at 20:45, Gwinn Giglio, Michelle wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure the gosubset_prok should be listed as a slim - its not  
> really a
> slim - its just the whole GO with euk specific terms subtracted  
> out.  It's
> really nothing like a slim.
>
> I have a prok GO slim that I built recently.  At some point I  
> wasn't sure
> how/where to submit it and I asked about it and then discussion  
> ensued and
> then I got distracted with other things.  Now I can't remember if I  
> brought
> it with me from TIGR but I should be able to get it.
>
> Michelle
>
>
>
> On 12/18/07 3:16 PM, "Seth Carbon" <sjcarbon at berkeleybop.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:06 +0000, Michael Ashburner wrote:
>>> Why are some, but not all, GO slims hyperlinked ?
>>
>> The short answer is that there is a limit on the size of subsets that
>> can be reasonably manipulated in AmiGO at this point. In the case  
>> of the
>> what is in the database so far, gosubset_prok falls outside this  
>> limit
>> and is not linkable (so gosubset_prok is the odd one out).
>>
>>> Looking at the PIR slim in Treeview I got this when invited to try
>>> "compact view of the graph":
>>>     *  fatal message   AmiGO could not find any terms to perform  
>>> your
>>> query upon. Please go back and select one or more terms.
>>
>> We have fixed this bug.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Seth
>>
>>
>