[go] AmiGO beta announcement

[Seth Carbon]

On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 22:08 +0000, Michael Ashburner wrote:
> Yes I agree Michelle, it is a subset, NOT a slim.

These have been removed in CVS.

Cheers,

-Seth


> Michael
> On 18 Dec 2007, at 20:45, Gwinn Giglio, Michelle wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure the gosubset_prok should be listed as a slim - its not  
> > really a
> > slim - its just the whole GO with euk specific terms subtracted  
> > out.  It's
> > really nothing like a slim.
> >
> > I have a prok GO slim that I built recently.  At some point I  
> > wasn't sure
> > how/where to submit it and I asked about it and then discussion  
> > ensued and
> > then I got distracted with other things.  Now I can't remember if I  
> > brought
> > it with me from TIGR but I should be able to get it.
> >
> > Michelle
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/18/07 3:16 PM, "Seth Carbon" <sjcarbon at berkeleybop.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:06 +0000, Michael Ashburner wrote:
> >>> Why are some, but not all, GO slims hyperlinked ?
> >>
> >> The short answer is that there is a limit on the size of subsets that
> >> can be reasonably manipulated in AmiGO at this point. In the case  
> >> of the
> >> what is in the database so far, gosubset_prok falls outside this  
> >> limit
> >> and is not linkable (so gosubset_prok is the odd one out).
> >>
> >>> Looking at the PIR slim in Treeview I got this when invited to try
> >>> "compact view of the graph":
> >>>     *  fatal message   AmiGO could not find any terms to perform  
> >>> your
> >>> query upon. Please go back and select one or more terms.
> >>
> >> We have fixed this bug.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the feedback!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> -Seth
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>