[go] AmiGO beta announcement

[Judith Blake]

Amelia Ireland wrote:

Amelia,

this sounds much better to us here in snowy BHB

judy
> Back in Gotham City, Valerie Wood wrote:
>
>   
>> I agree with David, most analysis which use GO are not reproducible
>> because details about GO data (annotations and ontology) and software
>> used are ommitted. I think we should provide this info at the top of the
>> results output. Perhaps the load date for now, until we have proper
>> versioning?
>>     
>
> How about something saying 'Cite this data', with information about the
> ontology version and the date when the annotations were updated? We should
> also update the GO website page about citing GO to state that you should
> specify this data when you use/publish data from AmiGO.
>
> Chris / Ben - can we get the ontology version data put into the database
> as well as the date when the annotations were updated? 
>
>