[go] total genes/gene products annotated versus genome size
Sue Rhee
rhee at acoma.Stanford.EDU
Thu Dec 20 11:03:59 PST 2007
Hi again,
Yes, Judy's point is well-taken. I have updated the table to reflect
only protein-encoding genes. I now have figures for arabidopsis, human,
cow, and chicken (thank you Emily). If other organism DBs could send me
their numbers, I would appreciate it very much.
species (NCBI taxon ID)
Genes^a with expt^b annotations
Total annotated genes^a
% genes^a with expt annotations
Total Genes^a
% annotated^c
% known in genome^d
baker’s yeast (4932)
fission yeast (4896)
fruit fly (7227)
worm (6239)
Candida albicans (5476)
arabidopsis^e (3702)
5530
26,637
20.8%
27,029
98.5%
20.5%
mouse (10090)
Human^f (9606)
4780
17,021
28.1%
20,887
81.5%
22.9%
slime mold (44689)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (208964)
rat (10116)
zebrafish (7955)
Plasmodium falciparum (5833)
Trypanosoma brucei (5691)
rice (39947)
Cow^f (9913)
96
8,536
1.1%
21,756
39.2 %
0.4%
Chicken^f (9031)
75
6,063
1.2%
16,737
36.2%
0.4%
^a Genes include only those that encode proteins.
^b Experimental annotations include those only with IDA, IEP, IGI, IMP
and IPI.
^c Portion annotated is determined by dividing the number of genes
annotated by total gene products.
^d Portion known in genome is determined by multiplying portion of
experimentally derived annotations by portion of the genome annotated.
^e Numbers are from TAIR, last updated 14/12/2007.
^f Numbers are from GOA, human data last updated 14/09/2007, cow data
last updated 17/01/2007, chicken data last updated 10/07/2007.^
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://fafner.stanford.edu/pipermail/go/attachments/20071220/5755079b/attachment.html
More information about the Go
mailing list