[go] total genes/gene products annotated versus genome size

[Mike Cherry]

May be this can be setup before the GOC.  What we need is someone to  
make a proposal for the format and content of the information to be  
added.

-Mike


On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Sue Rhee wrote:

> I agree. Can this be included as a topic for the next GOC meeting if  
> it isn't implemented by then?
> Sue
>
> Chris Mungall wrote:
>>
>> These numbers should be added as metadata in the comments of the  
>> association files (using SO IDs to be unambiguous and eliminate  
>> repetitive discussions about genes vs pc genes vs non-genes like  
>> pseudogenes)
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Sue Rhee wrote:
>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> Yes, Judy's point is well-taken. I have updated the table to  
>>> reflect only protein-encoding genes. I now have figures for  
>>> arabidopsis, human, cow, and chicken (thank you Emily). If other  
>>> organism DBs could send me their numbers, I would appreciate it  
>>> very much.
>