[go] please proof November07 newsletter

[David Hill]

Sorry Jen! This was my error. I didn't realize you guys worked on more 
than just process.

David

Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if I am seeing the final version yet, but the muscle 
> meeting included terms in more than just the process ontology so it 
> would be good if this could be taken into account. Some of our experts 
> worked very hard on component terms and would be dismayed if we said 
> in the newsletter that all the work had been on process. 'Two 
> large-scale additions were made to the Gene Ontologies in ' works well 
> I think.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jen
>
> Stacia Engel wrote:
>
>> hi Rama,
>> thanks for your feedback.  i have incorporated your edits.
>>
>> stacia
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Rama Balakrishnan wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks David. In that case, may be the sentence can be changed to  
>>> just-
>>>
>>> Two large-scale addition of GO terms to the Biological process  
>>> ontology was made.....
>>>
>>> Rama
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:57 PM, David Hill wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rama,
>>>>
>>>> The cardio and muscle terms were only added to process.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> Rama Balakrishnan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Newsletter looks very good. Nice job.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have couple of suggestions (take or leave)-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Section on Cardiovascular Physiology..
>>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>>> 1) Change first sentence to-
>>>>>
>>>>> Two large-scale addition *of GO terms* were made in October 2007...
>>>>>
>>>>> Was the addition to all 3 ontologies or only F and P? If latter,  
>>>>> may be we can even say-
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two large-scale addition of GO terms to the Molecular function  
>>>>>>> and Biological process ontolgies were made...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Change the sentence about using AmiGO to:
>>>>>
>>>>> To see the blood pressure regulation...use the AmiGO Advanced  
>>>>> Search; **type mtg_cardio or mtg_muscle in the text box on the  
>>>>> top and select 'All fields' in the 'Search Type' section.**
>>>>>
>>>>> Section on spsl2go
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> Last sentence of first para-should it be 'coded' in (IEA coded)?  
>>>>> can it be changed to '...electronic GO annotation (using IEA  
>>>>> evidence code) in our latest...'
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rama
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Stacia Engel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks everyone for input on the November 2007 issue of the GO  
>>>>>> newsletter.  We have a version that is ready for proofing by GOC  
>>>>>> members.  Please have a look and let us know if we have any  
>>>>>> errors, typos, etc.  We'd like to send it out by week's end.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Stacia & the Newsletter Team
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pdf -
>>>>>> http://www.yeastgenome.org/~stacia/GOnewsletterNovember07.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> html -
>>>>>> http://www.geneontology.org/test-html.shtml
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>