[go] please proof November07 newsletter

[Stacia Engel]

Hi Jen,
ok good, thanks.  i will change the text back (on my working copy) to  
'Two large-scale additions were made to the Gene Ontologies ...'

stacia

On Nov 15, 2007, at 5:15 AM, Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> No problem.:-) We had a surprisingly wide-ranging brief on the  
> muscle work. :-)
>
> Jen
>
>
> David Hill wrote:
>
>> Sorry Jen! This was my error. I didn't realize you guys worked on  
>> more than just process.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I am seeing the final version yet, but the muscle  
>>> meeting included terms in more than just the process ontology so  
>>> it would be good if this could be taken into account. Some of our  
>>> experts worked very hard on component terms and would be dismayed  
>>> if we said in the newsletter that all the work had been on  
>>> process. 'Two large-scale additions were made to the Gene  
>>> Ontologies in ' works well I think.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jen
>>>
>>> Stacia Engel wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi Rama,
>>>> thanks for your feedback.  i have incorporated your edits.
>>>>
>>>> stacia
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Rama Balakrishnan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks David. In that case, may be the sentence can be changed  
>>>>> to  just-
>>>>>
>>>>> Two large-scale addition of GO terms to the Biological process   
>>>>> ontology was made.....
>>>>>
>>>>> Rama
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:57 PM, David Hill wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rama,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The cardio and muscle terms were only added to process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rama Balakrishnan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Newsletter looks very good. Nice job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have couple of suggestions (take or leave)-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Section on Cardiovascular Physiology..
>>>>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>>>>> 1) Change first sentence to-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two large-scale addition *of GO terms* were made in October  
>>>>>>> 2007...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was the addition to all 3 ontologies or only F and P? If  
>>>>>>> latter,  may be we can even say-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Two large-scale addition of GO terms to the Molecular  
>>>>>>>>> function  and Biological process ontolgies were made...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) Change the sentence about using AmiGO to:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To see the blood pressure regulation...use the AmiGO  
>>>>>>> Advanced  Search; **type mtg_cardio or mtg_muscle in the text  
>>>>>>> box on the  top and select 'All fields' in the 'Search Type'  
>>>>>>> section.**
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Section on spsl2go
>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>> Last sentence of first para-should it be 'coded' in (IEA  
>>>>>>> coded)?  can it be changed to '...electronic GO annotation  
>>>>>>> (using IEA  evidence code) in our latest...'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thats all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rama
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Stacia Engel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for input on the November 2007 issue of the  
>>>>>>>> GO  newsletter.  We have a version that is ready for  
>>>>>>>> proofing by GOC  members.  Please have a look and let us  
>>>>>>>> know if we have any  errors, typos, etc.  We'd like to send  
>>>>>>>> it out by week's end.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Stacia & the Newsletter Team
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pdf -
>>>>>>>> http://www.yeastgenome.org/~stacia/GOnewsletterNovember07.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> html -
>>>>>>>> http://www.geneontology.org/test-html.shtml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Jennifer Deegan nee Clark
> EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute
> Gene Ontology Consortium