[go] please proof November07 newsletter

[Judith Blake]

why not just

to the Gene Ontology?

judy

Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> Good plan.
>
> Jen
>
> Amelia Ireland wrote:
>
>> Back in Gotham City, erika at cribi.unipd.it wrote:
>> [...]
>>  
>>
>>> As Jen correctly said, the muscle work includes also changes in 
>>> cellular component ontologies.
>>> So for me it is fine to say 'Two large-scale additions were made to 
>>> the Gene Ontologies ...'
>>>   
>>
>> I don't know if it's just me, but "the Gene Ontologies" sounds wrong
>> (especially since they're not ontologies of genes). Could we say "the GO
>> ontologies"?
>>
>> A.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>