[go] please proof November07 newsletter

[David Hill]

Gene Ontology is good.
The GO ontologies sounds a bit weird too.
David

Judith Blake wrote:
> why not just
>
> to the Gene Ontology?
>
> judy
>
> Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
>> Good plan.
>>
>> Jen
>>
>> Amelia Ireland wrote:
>>
>>> Back in Gotham City, erika at cribi.unipd.it wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>  
>>>
>>>> As Jen correctly said, the muscle work includes also changes in 
>>>> cellular component ontologies.
>>>> So for me it is fine to say 'Two large-scale additions were made to 
>>>> the Gene Ontologies ...'
>>>>   
>>>
>>> I don't know if it's just me, but "the Gene Ontologies" sounds wrong
>>> (especially since they're not ontologies of genes). Could we say 
>>> "the GO
>>> ontologies"?
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>
>