[go] please proof November07 newsletter

[Stacia Engel]

Ok, then, we'll say "Two large-scale additions were made to the Gene  
Ontology...."  Thanks everyone for your input.

stacia

On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:05 AM, David Hill wrote:

> Gene Ontology is good.
> The GO ontologies sounds a bit weird too.
> David
>
> Judith Blake wrote:
>> why not just
>>
>> to the Gene Ontology?
>>
>> judy
>>
>> Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
>>> Good plan.
>>>
>>> Jen
>>>
>>> Amelia Ireland wrote:
>>>
>>>> Back in Gotham City, erika at cribi.unipd.it wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> As Jen correctly said, the muscle work includes also changes in  
>>>>> cellular component ontologies.
>>>>> So for me it is fine to say 'Two large-scale additions were  
>>>>> made to the Gene Ontologies ...'
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if it's just me, but "the Gene Ontologies" sounds  
>>>> wrong
>>>> (especially since they're not ontologies of genes). Could we say  
>>>> "the GO
>>>> ontologies"?
>>>>
>>>> A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>