[go] multiple qualfiers

[Judith Blake]

I agree with Alex on this.  This was created, I would surmise, at the 
same time the 'colocalizes with' was.  The point is that this could be 
used at some time, and then we would have to go through the rigamarole 
of re-creating it.  In fact, I don't think we have that much 
'colocalizes with' at this point, but the stars are aligning for more of 
this data, and thus for the 'not' as well.

Judy

Alexander Diehl wrote:
> While I agree that the combination of 'not' and 'colocalizes with' or 
> 'not' and 'contributes to' are quite rare, data and assertions by 
> experimental scientists supporting such annotations are fully within 
> the range of possibilities.
>
> These choices have been built into MGI's annotation tool for some time 
> now.  I don't see the harm in allowing the possibility to remain to 
> make such annotations, although personally I don't use 'not' even by 
> itself very much at all.
>
> -- Alex
>
>
> Benjamin Hitz wrote:
>>
>> They are apparently allowed in the specs, i.e., "not colocalizes with".
>> I can find no such annotations.
>>
>> Do we really need this?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben Hitz
>> Senior Scientific Programmer ** Saccharomyces Genome Database ** GO 
>> Consortium
>> Stanford University ** hitz at genome.stanford.edu
>>
>>
>>
>
>