[go] Do you upgrade InterPro2GO IEA annotations to ISS?

[Kimberly Van Auken]

Hi--

We essentially do the same at WormBase.  We run Interproscan for each 
release of our
database (every three weeks), use the IEA evidence code for these 
annotations without
further evaluation, and put the InterPro ID in the 'with' field.

--Kimberly


David Hill wrote:

> Emily,
>
> MGI does as ZFIN does. We delete and reload once a week with the IEA 
> evidence code.
>
> David
>
> Doug howe wrote:
>
>> Hi Emily,
>>  ZFIN applies the interpro2go translation table whenever we refresh 
>> our data from Uniprot.  We do not evaluate these, they get IEA, and 
>> the InterPro ID in the 'with' field.  We have an internal pub that 
>> describes this process.
>> -Doug
>>
>> E Dimmer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A question for those GO annotation groups that manually assess 
>>> InterPro2GO 'IEA' predictions, and when appropriate, convert them 
>>> into manual ISS annotations.
>>>
>>> I would be very grateful if you could let me know what criteria your 
>>> group uses to evaluate InterPro2GO annotations. What data sources do 
>>> you look at to confirm whether these electronic predictions are 
>>> correct and what information does your final annotation include? 
>>> (i.e. I assume that the InterPro ID would go into the 'with' column, 
>>> but what would be cited in the reference column - do you have a GO 
>>> reference?), also how long does this process take? Am I right in 
>>> thinking that S. Pombe and DictyBase groups carry out these kinds of 
>>> annotations?
>>>
>>> I have just been asked this by a group who are considering whether 
>>> they could carry out this kind of assessment while annotating their 
>>> new genome.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Emily
>>>
>
>
>