[go] Requirement for all 'unknown' annotations to use ND code

[Valerie Wood]

Would it be useful to know which other codes we have used for root node 
annotations (in addition to the ND ones you mention here).
i.e have people used TAS?

We seem to have established that ND should not be used to retrieve root 
node annotations.

However, I'm not sure that we should use TAS and a paper as root node 
annotations should reflect the fact that checks have been done that no 
other paper has been published/ similarity identified/ from which an 
inference/annotation could be made.
If you were curating a paper which was one year old  and the author 
stated there was no functional information, as a curator wouldn't you 
check that there was no subsequent info?




Mike Cherry wrote:

> Duh, I was thinking no results for NR.
>
> Never mind...
>
> -Mike
>
> On Sep 15, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Karen Christie wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Thanks for the info, but the NR code is not the one that is used  for 
>> annotations to the root nodes. NR stands for Not Recorded and  is 
>> obsolete for new usage.
>>
>> -Karen
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.