[Go] secretory pathway (SF 1912842)

[Midori Harris]

A few responses have come in via email and in the SF item. Most favor, or 
at least accept, making GO:0045045 obsolete. Official alert email on the 
way as soon as I get annotation counts.

m

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Midori Harris wrote:

> Dear GO,
>
> Questions have arisen about the process term 'secretory pathway'
> (GO:0045045). At first the aim was to improve the definition, but
> upon further discussion we're now leaningtowards making the term obsolete.
> Could people take a look at the SourceForge item and let us know if
> there's a case for keeping the term? If no arguments in its favor emerge,
> I'll send the formal obsoletion warning email in a few days.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1912842&group_id=36855&atid=440764
>
> Thanks,
> Midori
> _______________________________________________
> Go mailing list
> Go at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>