[Go] Composition of the generic GO slim
Michael Ashburner
ma11 at gen.cam.ac.uk
Wed Apr 30 13:03:36 PDT 2008
I take that as an offer - :=) Michael
On 30 Apr 2008, at 14:59, Amelia Ireland wrote:
> Back in Gotham City, Emily Dimmer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> From replying to a user request, I've just been having a quick
>> look at
>> the composition of the generic GO slim, and relating the GO terms
>> included to the number of annotations displayed by AmiGO.
>
> I can't speak for any of the other GO slims, but the generic GO
> slim is
> very out of date and really needs to be looked at again, as there have
> been a lot of changes in the ontology over the past year or so, and
> I'm
> not sure that the generic slim has been updated to reflect those
> changes.
>
> Cheers,
> Amelia.
>
> --
> Amelia Ireland
> GO Editorial Office
> http://www.ebi.ac.uk || http://www.berkeleybop.org
> Carbon neutral driving: http://www.targetneutral.com/TONIC/index.jsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Go mailing list
> Go at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
More information about the Go
mailing list