[go] AmiGO beta announcement
Susan Tweedie
sart2 at gen.cam.ac.uk
Tue Jan 8 03:28:18 PST 2008
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:41 -0800, Chris Mungall wrote:
> Both displays confused me at first, but I believe this to be because
> of a bug in the data. FB appear to be submitting a fake non-NOT
> annotation corresponding to every real NOT annotation. Either that or
> there are a lot of self-contradictory papers.
Oh dear.... thanks Chris - there is clearly a bug in the script used to
make our ga file which has resulted in a systematic parial duplication
of lines with qualiers. I'll get it fixed. However, we do have some
genuinely contradictory evidence for the same term based on different
papers. Although I would normally prefer to see the qualifier in front
of the GO term, I like the way Amelia's new config has each term only
once. If there is contradictory evidence for a term, it is important to
spot it - this is easier when it is gathered together in a single block
rather than under 2 separate term entries.
Susan
>
> On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Eurie Hong wrote:
>
> > I agree with Rama - the new column configuration implies that it's
> > the evidence code that being qualified. And I prefer the
> > organization on the beta, especially with the "contributes_to" and
> > "colocalizes_with" qualifiers.
> >
> > But I agree that counts are misleading. Can the count for the
> > qualified terms be calculated separately from the non-qualified
> > terms? Or just go back to the "view associations" that's currently
> > in production.
> >
> > eurie
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Alexander Diehl wrote:
> >
> >> Rama,
> >>
> >> I'm sorry if you find this misleading now. In my earlier post I
> >> explained how I found the previous arrangement (in the beta)
> >> misleading. Again, it comes down to trying to convey the maximal
> >> amount of information in the least amount of interface space.
> >> While I appreciate your concern, I still feel Amelia's new
> >> arrangement is less misleading than the previous arrangement of
> >> columns, but this is probably quite subjective.
> >>
> >> If anyone else is wondering what this about, compare these two
> >> displays:
> >>
> >> 1) (current beta) http://goweb-dev.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-
> >> assoc.cgi?gp=FB:FBgn0027356
> >>
> >> 2) (Amelia's new column configuration) http://toy.lbl.gov:9012/
> >> cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?gp=FB:FBgn0027356
> >>
> >> or these two:
> >>
> >> 1) (current beta) http://goweb-dev.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-
> >> assoc.cgi?gp=MGI:MGI:2685628
> >>
> >> 2) (Amelia's new column configuration) http://toy.lbl.gov:9012/
> >> cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?gp=MGI:MGI:2685628
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rama Balakrishnan wrote:
> >>> Sorry for not piping in earlier on this one. The way you have
> >>> reordered it (http://toy.lbl.gov:9012/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?
> >>> gp=FB:FBgn0027356) with the NOT next to the evidence code, it
> >>> looks like the qualifier goes with the evidence code. I think
> >>> this is misleading..
> >>>
> >>> rama
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 7, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Amelia Ireland wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>
> >>>> [displaying NOT annotations and column ordering]
> >>>>>>> http://goweb-dev.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?
> >>>>>>> gp=MGI:MGI:2685628&session_id=1458amigo1197932357
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the first line of the listed associations reads Qualifier:
> >>>>>>> NOT, Term: GO:0051092 : activation of NF-kappaB transcription
> >>>>>>> factor, link: 63 gene products,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've changed the column so that it is hopefully a little clearer
> >>>> now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Example:
> >>>> http://toy.lbl.gov:9012/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?
> >>>> gp=FB:FBgn0027356
> >>>>
> >>>> Does that work?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Amelia.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Amelia Ireland
> >>>> GO Editorial Office,
> >>>> European Bioinformatics Institute, UK.
> >>>> Carbon neutral driving: http://www.targetneutral.com/TONIC/
> >>>> index.jsp
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alexander Diehl, Ph.D.
> >> Senior Scientific Curator
> >> Mouse Genome Informatics
> >> The Jackson Laboratory
> >> 600 Main Street
> >> Bar Harbor, ME 04609
> >>
> >> email: adiehl at informatics.jax.org
> >> work: +1 (207) 288-6427
> >> fax: +1 (207) 288-6131
> >
> >
>
More information about the Go
mailing list