[Go] secretory pathway (SF 1912842)

[Midori Harris]

Dear GO,

Questions have arisen about the process term 'secretory pathway' 
(GO:0045045). At first the aim was to improve the definition, but 
upon further discussion we're now leaningtowards making the term obsolete. 
Could people take a look at the SourceForge item and let us know if 
there's a case for keeping the term? If no arguments in its favor emerge, 
I'll send the formal obsoletion warning email in a few days.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1912842&group_id=36855&atid=440764

Thanks,
Midori