[Go] secretory pathway (SF 1912842)

[Pankaj Jaiswal]

Correcting my self. The tools do not use the GO term, but the predicted 
results can be translated to associate with the GO term for annotation 
and analysis by users, if the proteins are predicted to have 'secretory 
pathway' annotations from these tools.

Pankaj

Pankaj Jaiswal wrote:
> Ask the group developing SecretomeP
> http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SecretomeP/output.php
> and SiglaP/TargetP
> http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/output.php
> 
> They have often used this term in the results of their analysis tool.
> 
> Pankaj
> 
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> Dear GO,
>>
>> Questions have arisen about the process term 'secretory pathway' 
>> (GO:0045045). At first the aim was to improve the definition, but 
>> upon further discussion we're now leaningtowards making the term obsolete. 
>> Could people take a look at the SourceForge item and let us know if 
>> there's a case for keeping the term? If no arguments in its favor emerge, 
>> I'll send the formal obsoletion warning email in a few days.
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1912842&group_id=36855&atid=440764
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Midori