[Go] generic GO slim question

[Jim Hu]

 From what I can tell about the discussions of slims I've heard at GOC  
meetings, part of the problem is that maintaining them is an extra  
task that no one really has time to do.  Which makes me wonder if  
slimming can be automated in some way.  For example, anything that is  
used for a manual annotation of a prokaryote would go in the  
prokaryotic slim.

Jim


On Jun 14, 2009, at 4:54 AM, Valerie Wood wrote:

>
> How was it decided which terms to include in the generic GO slim?
>
> There have been discussions previously about what makes a useful and  
> relevent  generic GO slim (but no agreement). However, it seems that  
> at the very least  the terms should be i) general, and ii) high  
> level terms which constitute major cellular processes (and therefore  
> areas of research) should be included.
>
> So, I was wondering why the following terms are in the slim (I have  
> included the TOTAL number of annotations for all organisms in  
> parenthases)
>
> i) plastid translation [1]
> ii) lead ion binding [2]
> iii) cytoplasmic chromosome [28]
> iv) neurotransmitter transporter [55]
>
> Conversely the following biologically important "general" terms (at  
> least from a single celled organism perprective) , are absent from  
> the generic GO slim
>
> i) DNA replication [1685]
> ii) DNA repair [1934]
> iii) transmembrane transport [814]
> iv) ribosome biogenesis [1849]
> v) cytokinesis [1049]
> vi) cytoskeletal organization [2311]
> and others.
>
> In addition, there is an obsolete molecular function term in the  
> slim (chaperone regulator activity)
>
> I wondered whether the contents of the slim need to be to make it  
> more useful.  I realise it isn't easy to make a slim which is good  
> for all organisms. If this is the case perhaps we should consider  
> abandoning the "generic generic" slim and define more useful  
> individual  generic slims for prokaryotes, eukaryotic  unicellular,  
> and multicellular orgs?
>
> We might not agree about the utility  of a "generic slim" but these  
> are used a lot as they are the default slims used by AmiGO, and the  
> Princeton generic GO term mapper.......They should provide a good  
> overview of the known biology of any organism. They should probably   
> provide a starting point for people who wish  to refine to make  
> their own slim and include more specific terms for their area of  
> interest, and remove terms which are not useful.  I am trying to  
> write a tutorial which includes how to select terms for a slim to  
> give complete coverage for their organism, and refine to make a more  
> specific slim, but the the generic slim doesn't  seem to provide  
> very good example for a starting point.
>
> Val
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research  
> Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a  
> company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered  
> office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.  
> _______________________________________________
> Go mailing list
> Go at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go

=====================================
Jim Hu
Associate Professor
Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics
2128 TAMU
Texas A&M Univ.
College Station, TX 77843-2128
979-862-4054


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fafner.stanford.edu/pipermail/go/attachments/20090616/3ca08a38/attachment.html>