[Go] addition of localization specific process terms ?

[val at sanger.ac.uk]

I agree, it is far better to have pre-composed terms if possible,
especially for new curators.
As we encourage annotation to the most specific term possible it is hard
to overlook the precomposed terms, because we (I hope) always check the
child terms).

Val

>  From someone who has been annotating using a lot of pre-composition as
> well as post-composition for a reasonably long time;  although there is
> an initial activation energy to get a pre-composed term into the
> ontology, once they are there, they are much easier to use than to look
> up things in multiple ontologies for post-composition.
>
> The key to finding pre-composed terms easily is to have a good way of
> viewing the ontology.
>
> my 2c
>
> D
>>
>>
>> I would like to hear the opinion of some of the annotators here. Is
>> excessive pre-coordination a concern for curation?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Go mailing list
> Go at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>




-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.