[Go] addition of localization specific process terms ?

Alexander Diehl adiehl at informatics.jax.org
Tue Mar 24 06:38:46 PDT 2009


I want to add my agreement to the words of Val and David.  It is much 
simpler to use a pre-composed existing term in annotation.  One aspect 
of the annotation process I feel is over looked as we add more 
complexity to the annotation process is that post-composition adds a 
significant bit of time to the annotation process, resulting in fewer 
annotations overall and lower metrics for the database and grant.  While 
it is important to do detailed and correct annotations whenever 
possible, anything we can to do to increase throughput, such as 
precomposing likely terms, is beneficial.  I'm not saying we should add 
all possible combinations of X and Y, just the appropriate ones.  This 
is one of the main reasons for having annotators lead ontology 
development and holding ontology content meetings where expert 
biologists can discuss processes actually seen in nature, so that the 
appropriate combinations of X and Y are added.

And knowing which pre-composed terms to use is a matter of training and 
experience, both in general biology, and in annotation.  There's no way 
around it.

-- Alex


val at sanger.ac.uk wrote:
> I agree, it is far better to have pre-composed terms if possible,
> especially for new curators.
> As we encourage annotation to the most specific term possible it is hard
> to overlook the precomposed terms, because we (I hope) always check the
> child terms).
>
> Val
>
>   
>>  From someone who has been annotating using a lot of pre-composition as
>> well as post-composition for a reasonably long time;  although there is
>> an initial activation energy to get a pre-composed term into the
>> ontology, once they are there, they are much easier to use than to look
>> up things in multiple ontologies for post-composition.
>>
>> The key to finding pre-composed terms easily is to have a good way of
>> viewing the ontology.
>>
>> my 2c
>>
>> D
>>     
>>> I would like to hear the opinion of some of the annotators here. Is
>>> excessive pre-coordination a concern for curation?
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Go mailing list
>> Go at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 
Alexander D. Diehl, Ph.D.
Senior Scientific Curator
Mouse Genome Informatics
The Jackson Laboratory
600 Main Street
Bar Harbor, ME  04609

email:  adiehl at informatics.jax.org
work:  +1 (207) 288-6427
fax:  +1 (207) 288-6131



More information about the Go mailing list