<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">I wonder why we can't write
CBS: TMHMM and CBS: SignalP </font><br>
Seems accepted by our guidelines<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://geneontology.org/cgi-bin/xrefs.cgi#ref-C">http://geneontology.org/cgi-bin/xrefs.cgi#ref-C</a><br>
<br>
Pascale<br>
<br>
Gwinn Giglio, Michelle wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:C476CEF6.1920%25mgiglio@som.umaryland.edu"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I think we do need some kind of consensus - anyone else want to voice an
opinion?
Michelel
On 6/12/08 11:48 AM, "Pankaj Jaiswal" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pj37@cornell.edu"><pj37@cornell.edu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Great. Do we need a formal word or voting on this request. We are
waiting to submit some of our annotations that didn't make it through
due to the mandatory 'with' rule.
Pankaj
Gwinn Giglio, Michelle wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Well, considering our new policy for ISS not requiring "with" for the very
types of evidence you mention, it seems IEA should not require "with" as
well......
Michelle
On 6/11/08 1:12 PM, "Pankaj Jaiswal" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pj37@cornell.edu"><pj37@cornell.edu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I didn't hear from the group on this. Could you please help.
Pankaj
Pankaj Jaiswal wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml#iea">http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml#iea</a>
Ref: From the above site
Usage of the With/From Column for IEA
At the January 2007 GOC meeting, it was agreed that it will be required
to make an entry in the with/from column for all annotations made after
May 1, 2007 when using this evidence code to indicate what individual
sequences, sequence objects, methods, keyword mapping files, etc. are
the basis of the annotation. When multiple entries are placed in the
with/from field, they are separated by pipes.
------------
Based on this rule, would you please suggest, what would be the value
for the 'WITH' column.
- if we are making a TMHMM prediction for a 'putative tansmembrane'
annotation
- if we have used TargetP/SignalP/Predotar/Psort to predict a putative
cellular localization
None of the above prediction softwares give appropriate value to be
filled in the 'WITH' column.
If you agree our suggestion is to relax this rule for IEA's.
Pankaj
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Go mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Go@geneontology.org">Go@geneontology.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go">http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
Annotation mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Annotation@geneontology.org">Annotation@geneontology.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/annotation">http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/annotation</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>