[Ontology-editors] new xp file

[Midori Harris]

Maske sense to me (using FAO, that is, not that parentage in CL!).

m

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:

>
> Great!
>
> There's also cellular_component_xp_cell.obo - we should remove the following:
>
> [Term]
> id: GO:0030446 ! hyphal cell wall
> intersection_of: GO:0005618 ! cell wall
> intersection_of: part_of CL:0000286 ! hyphal cell
>
> FAO, whilst unmaintained, would seem to be a more reliable source for fungal 
> cells. CL has horrible things like spore is_a fungal cell AND spore is_a 
> prokaryotic cell
>
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2009, at 2:57 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've added a small new file of cross-products between GO CC and fungal 
>> anatomy (FAO) - cellular_component_xp_fungal_anatomy.obo. It lets me get SF 
>> 1797561 closed; they're all good to GO.
>> 
>> m
>