[Ontology-editors] Wikipedia

[Chris Mungall]

Link should work now.

List for CC attached. Let me know if an alternate format (e.g. html  
page) is preferable. I could possibly slurp in the first paragraph  
from the wikipage into the table to help.

This is based on exact synonyms only. I omitted abbreviations since  
these most probably go to the wikipedia disambiguation page.

omitting abbrev: GO:0000407 PAS
omitting abbrev: GO:0000500 UAF
omitting abbrev: GO:0005628 FSM
omitting abbrev: GO:0005786 SRP
omitting abbrev: GO:0005854 NAC
omitting abbrev: GO:0008180 CSN
omitting abbrev: GO:0015627 MTB
omitting abbrev: GO:0016010 DGC
omitting abbrev: GO:0022623 PAN
omitting abbrev: GO:0030895 APOBEC
omitting abbrev: GO:0030896 CCC
omitting abbrev: GO:0030907 MBF
omitting abbrev: GO:0031431 DDK
omitting abbrev: GO:0031510 SAE
omitting abbrev: GO:0032046 MIPA
omitting abbrev: GO:0033597 MCC
omitting abbrev: GO:0034515 PSG
omitting abbrev: GO:0034751 AHRC
omitting abbrev: GO:0034992 MAS
omitting abbrev: GO:0035061 ICG
omitting abbrev: GO:0035145 EJC
omitting abbrev: GO:0035301 HSC
omitting abbrev: GO:0042101 TCR


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cc2wikipedia.tbl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22066 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://fafner.stanford.edu/pipermail/ontology-editors/attachments/20090126/10b5b9b4/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------




On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Midori Harris wrote:

> Well, I got a "bad gateway" squawk from that link, but it sounds  
> good. I think it might be best if we vet your matches before we add  
> the xrefs -- if we have a list, we can check up on them on a Friday  
> afternoon :)
>
> m
>
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:
>
>>
>> I can match about ~1000 GO terms to wikipedia pages with a high  
>> degree of accuracy. If we add these as xrefs, then we can make  
>> amigo pull in the relevant text and images; for example:
>>
>> http://obofoundry.org/obo/UBERON:FMA_67947-MA_0000210
>>
>> This seems like the big win: the curated structure and formal  
>> definitions of an ontology combined with nice descriptive prose and  
>> images from the wider wikipedia community.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>