[Ontology-editors] GO_REF

[Midori Harris]

Any objection, then, to moving the GO_REF to the def dbxrefs?

m

On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I did a lot of the editing for the CNS meeting, but I didn't add these 
> comments. There were three other people editing, and they were Doug, David, 
> and a non-GO curator at MGI.
>
> Jen
>
>
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> Short answer: I don't know ... it's from the CNS meeting, but I don't 
>> recall nitty-gritty about comment vs. dbxref. (ccing Doug because he's not 
>> on the list)
>> 
>> m
>> 
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:
>> 
>>> Why are these in the comments (where they need special code to parse) 
>>> rather than in the definition dbxref?
>>> 
>>> [Term]
>>> id: GO:0021518
>>> name: spinal cord commissural neuron specification
>>> namespace: biological_process
>>> def: "The process whereby a cell becomes capable of differentiating 
>>> autonomously into a commissural neuron in an environment that is neutral 
>>> with respect to the developmental pathway." [GOC:cls, GOC:dgh, GOC:dph, 
>>> GOC:jic, GOC:mtg_15jun06]
>>> comment: This term was added by GO_REF:0000021.
>>> is_a: GO:0048665 ! neuron fate specification
>>> relationship: part_of GO:0021528 ! commissural neuron differentiation in 
>>> the spinal cord
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>