[Ontology-editors] GO_REF

[Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark)]

No, that sounds sensible to me.

Jen

Midori Harris wrote:
> Any objection, then, to moving the GO_REF to the def dbxrefs?
> 
> m
> 
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did a lot of the editing for the CNS meeting, but I didn't add these 
>> comments. There were three other people editing, and they were Doug, 
>> David, and a non-GO curator at MGI.
>>
>> Jen
>>
>>
>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>> Short answer: I don't know ... it's from the CNS meeting, but I don't 
>>> recall nitty-gritty about comment vs. dbxref. (ccing Doug because 
>>> he's not on the list)
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why are these in the comments (where they need special code to 
>>>> parse) rather than in the definition dbxref?
>>>>
>>>> [Term]
>>>> id: GO:0021518
>>>> name: spinal cord commissural neuron specification
>>>> namespace: biological_process
>>>> def: "The process whereby a cell becomes capable of differentiating 
>>>> autonomously into a commissural neuron in an environment that is 
>>>> neutral with respect to the developmental pathway." [GOC:cls, 
>>>> GOC:dgh, GOC:dph, GOC:jic, GOC:mtg_15jun06]
>>>> comment: This term was added by GO_REF:0000021.
>>>> is_a: GO:0048665 ! neuron fate specification
>>>> relationship: part_of GO:0021528 ! commissural neuron 
>>>> differentiation in the spinal cord
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>>>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>>