[Ontology-editors] GO_REF

[Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark)]

Hi,

No, this was definitely not me. We added something along the lines of 
GOC:mtg_cns in the def dbxref but nothing starting GO_REF, and no xrefs 
in the comment field.

Jen

David Hill wrote:
> I think Jen just added these during the meeting to keep track of the 
> terms we were working on. She might know better than I.
> 
> David
> 
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> Short answer: I don't know ... it's from the CNS meeting, but I don't 
>> recall nitty-gritty about comment vs. dbxref. (ccing Doug because he's 
>> not on the list)
>>
>> m
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:
>>
>>> Why are these in the comments (where they need special code to parse) 
>>> rather than in the definition dbxref?
>>>
>>> [Term]
>>> id: GO:0021518
>>> name: spinal cord commissural neuron specification
>>> namespace: biological_process
>>> def: "The process whereby a cell becomes capable of differentiating 
>>> autonomously into a commissural neuron in an environment that is 
>>> neutral with respect to the developmental pathway." [GOC:cls, 
>>> GOC:dgh, GOC:dph, GOC:jic, GOC:mtg_15jun06]
>>> comment: This term was added by GO_REF:0000021.
>>> is_a: GO:0048665 ! neuron fate specification
>>> relationship: part_of GO:0021528 ! commissural neuron differentiation 
>>> in the spinal cord
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>