[Ontology-editors] draft has_part announcement

[David Hill]

>
>
> A -regulates-> B -regulates-> C
>
> then
>
> A -indirectly regulates-> C
>
> ?
>
Yes.

So here are the rules that fit when we were looking at examples from BP. 
Tanya will correct me if I'm misremembering.

A -regulates-> B -regulates-> C, then    A -indirectly regulates-> C

A -neg_regulates-> B -neg_regulates-> C, then A -indirectly 
pos_regulates-> C


A -neg_regulates-> B -pos_regulates-> C, then A -indirectly 
neg_regulates-> C


A -pos_regulates-> B -neg_regulates-> C, then A -indirectly 
neg_regulates-> C


A -neg_regulates-> B -regulates-> C, then A -indirectly regulates-> C


A -regulates-> B -neg_regulates-> C, then A -indirectly regulates-> C


A -pos_regulates-> B -regulates-> C, then A -indirectly regulates-> C


A -regulates-> B -pos_regulates-> C, then A -indirectly regulates-> C