[Ontology-editors] procedure? for old SF item, now high priority

[Jane Lomax]

Hi Karen - I think upping the priority on an old item is fine, as long as 
it's assigned to someone so they'll get an email.

I'll do that item today for you.

Jane

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Karen Christie wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was about to create a new SF item requesting a definition change to an 
> existing term, but before I did that, I did a search to check for related 
> items, and found that there was an existing item that was on basically the 
> same subject, so I posted comments there and marked the item high priority.
>
> But then I was thinking this might not be a very good way to get quick action 
> on an old item, so I wanted to ask about the best way to handle a situation 
> where one wants to bring an old item back to the forefront for action, and 
> also get speedy action on this one:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1411241&group_id=36855&atid=440764
>
> It is currently assigned to Jane, do you still handle routine editing? or if 
> you don't, then if you could relinquish it, and may be Midori could do it, or 
> I could, that would be great.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Karen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ontology-editors mailing list
> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>

-- 
Dr Jane Lomax
GO Editorial Office
EMBL-EBI
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton
Cambridgeshire, UK
CB10 1SD

p: +44 1223 492516
f: +44 1223 494468