[Ontology-editors] procedure? for old SF item, now high priority

[Midori Harris]

I agree; if an item is unassigned, or if you have any other reason to want 
to back up the priority change, email like this is fine too.

m

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jane Lomax wrote:

> Hi Karen - I think upping the priority on an old item is fine, as long as 
> it's assigned to someone so they'll get an email.
>
> I'll do that item today for you.
>
> Jane
>
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Karen Christie wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was about to create a new SF item requesting a definition change to an 
>> existing term, but before I did that, I did a search to check for related 
>> items, and found that there was an existing item that was on basically the 
>> same subject, so I posted comments there and marked the item high priority.
>> 
>> But then I was thinking this might not be a very good way to get quick 
>> action on an old item, so I wanted to ask about the best way to handle a 
>> situation where one wants to bring an old item back to the forefront for 
>> action, and also get speedy action on this one:
>> 
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1411241&group_id=36855&atid=440764
>> 
>> It is currently assigned to Jane, do you still handle routine editing? or 
>> if you don't, then if you could relinquish it, and may be Midori could do 
>> it, or I could, that would be great.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> -Karen
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>> 
>
>