[Ontology-editors] haspart documentation (meeting with Chris (fwd))

[Amelia Ireland]

On Jun 12, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Midori Harris wrote:

> Hi Amelia,
>
> If you read the minutes from yesterday carefully, you'll notice that  
> we volunteered you to write documentation for the has_part  
> relationship. because Chris told us you had started on it, but put  
> it on hold when the F-P link team opted for part_of. Now that we've  
> decide to revive has_part and get it into CC (and BP not too long  
> after), the documentation is percolating back up the priority heap.


I saw that yesterday, and I think I've almost finished writing it  
(shock, horror!). I've just got a couple of diagrams to complete. I'll  
email a link when it's ready for viewing action.

Are there going to be terms linked as A has part B and B part of A?  
That might want a bit of extra documentation if so.

Cheers,
Amelia.

--
Amelia Ireland
GO Editorial Office
http://www.berkeleybop.org || http://www.ebi.ac.uk
BBOP Plant Project: http://bbopgarden.blogspot.com