[Ontology-editors] haspart documentation (meeting with Chris (fwd))

[Midori Harris]

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Amelia Ireland wrote:

>
> On Jun 12, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
>
>> Hi Amelia,
>> 
>> If you read the minutes from yesterday carefully, you'll notice that we 
>> volunteered you to write documentation for the has_part relationship. 
>> because Chris told us you had started on it, but put it on hold when the 
>> F-P link team opted for part_of. Now that we've decide to revive has_part 
>> and get it into CC (and BP not too long after), the documentation is 
>> percolating back up the priority heap.
>
>
> I saw that yesterday, and I think I've almost finished writing it (shock, 
> horror!). I've just got a couple of diagrams to complete. I'll email a link 
> when it's ready for viewing action.

excellent

> Are there going to be terms linked as A has part B and B part of A? That 
> might want a bit of extra documentation if so.

We didn't talk about making this kind of reciprocal link, and I have no 
plans to do so. I can't rule it out forever, since there must be some 
biological examples, but it's not the short- or medium-term goal.

cheers,
m