[Ontology-editors] haspart documentation (meeting with Chris (fwd))

[Amelia Ireland]

On Jun 12, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Midori Harris wrote:

> Hi Amelia,
>
> If you read the minutes from yesterday carefully, you'll notice that  
> we volunteered you to write documentation for the has_part  
> relationship. because Chris told us you had started on it, but put  
> it on hold when the F-P link team opted for part_of. Now that we've  
> decide to revive has_part and get it into CC (and BP not too long  
> after), the documentation is percolating back up the priority heap.
>
> Once the documentation is up, we'll announce it on GO Friends and  
> I'll get on with the test case.


http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~aji/go/GO.ontology.relationships.shtml

Questions:

- are those examples OK?

- should I make more of the difference between "has part" and "part  
of", and that one is from the perspective of the child, whereas the  
other is from the perspective of the parent?

- have any colours been thought of for the "has part" link?

- in the has-part diagrams, I tried to make a visual difference  
between the "ALL x ... y" and "SOME x ... y" rules. Does it make it  
any clearer, or should I just redo those diagrams in the standard style?

Cheers,
Amelia.

--
Amelia Ireland
GO Editorial Office
http://www.berkeleybop.org || http://www.ebi.ac.uk
BBOP Plant Project: http://bbopgarden.blogspot.com