[Ontology-editors] haspart documentation (meeting with Chris (fwd))

[Amelia Ireland]

On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Amelia Ireland wrote:
>
>> - are those examples OK?
>
> They're probably OK, but it might be safest to run them by some of  
> our prokaryote experts (Michelle, Jim, Debby, etc.). In the past  
> everyone thought chromatin was a eukaryote-specific feature, and  
> although that seems to be changing, I did a quick-n-dirty Google  
> search, and found that there are still at least a few sources that  
> say bacteria don't have chromatin (e.g. PMID:17148507). I don't know  
> whether you think that's enough reason to choose different examples.

I was a bit dubious of the "has part" examples - I started questioning  
the logic behind it and then it seemed I could only come up with  
examples that shouldn't be "has part"! If there are any really nice  
obvious (i.e. that people will have heard of) "has part" examples,  
they would be most gratefully received - particularly for "A has part  
B has part C".

Cheers!

--
Amelia Ireland
GO Editorial Office
http://www.berkeleybop.org || http://www.ebi.ac.uk
BBOP Plant Project: http://bbopgarden.blogspot.com