[Ontology-editors] another question about biogenesis/organization
Valerie Wood
val at sanger.ac.uk
Tue Jun 16 10:36:37 PDT 2009
Sorry, I still haven't got my head around this...see my recent SF
item.....problem with my slimming
I am still trying to get a slim for a tutorial which gives good coverage
of all of my annotated gene products.
Previously I had the term "cell wall organization and biogenesis" which
covered all of cell wall organization and biogenesis.
Now organization and biogenesis are "disjoint" (am I using the correct
terminology?) I need to include *Both* the organization and biogenesis
term, when it seems as though I really want one term to cover both of
these cell wall processes at this level, and that they are intimately
related. I'm not sure how my original annotations got split between the
the 2 new terms but there isn't much overlap now......
73 to biogenesis
and 63 to organization
21 to both
However when I look through the list I am pretty sure all of those
annotated to biogenesis to equally be annotated to organization.
Now, if i don't include both of these terms in the slim, I get gene
products which do not map to a high level term.
Any thoughts?
Val
--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
More information about the Ontology-editors
mailing list