[Ontology-editors] [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms (fwd)

[Midori Harris]

In the SF comments we were leaning toward doing the merge and the F-P 
links at the same time (even though they don't have to be coupled), so I 
could still wait to do the merge.

m

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:

> I think the merge is separate from the F-P links, so go ahead and make the 
> merge. We aren't up to this on the F-P links yet.
>
> David
>
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> Yes, I understand that -- that's precisely what the plan has been for 
>> weeks. The question was, are we ready to do it? And if so, who does the 
>> editing? (I'm happy to but thought I'd see if you wanted to add it to the 
>> other MF-BP work.)
>> 
>> m
>> 
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>> 
>>> Midori,
>>> 
>>> If there are specific function terms that describe the specific amino 
>>> acids, then these would just all become part_of the generic parent.
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Remember this? When we left it, we'd pretty much agreed to merge the 
>>>> amino-acid-specific process terms into the parent, as soon as we could 
>>>> also make part_of
>>>> 
>>>> Tanya & David - would these MF-BP links fit in with the ones you're 
>>>> doing?
>>>> 
>>>> m
>>>> 
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:00:20 +0100 (BST)
>>>> From: Midori Harris <midori at ebi.ac.uk>
>>>> To: GO Mailing List <go at genome.stanford.edu>
>>>> Subject: [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms
>>>> 
>>>> Dear GO,
>>>> 
>>>> In SF 2723153, there is a proposal to merge the amino-acid-specific tRNA 
>>>> aminoacylation terms with the corresponding general parent.
>>>> 
>>>> For example, these two terms (and their siblings, omitted for brevity) 
>>>> would be merged with the parent GO:0006418 tRNA aminoacylation for 
>>>> protein translation:
>>>>
>>>>   GO:0006419 alanyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>   GO:0006420 arginyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>> 
>>>> (The original request suggests obsoletion, but the proposal has been 
>>>> altered to merging.)
>>>> 
>>>> We would like to know whether there is broad support for this change, so 
>>>> please reply or comment on the SF item to say whether you think this is a 
>>>> good or bad idea.
>>>> 
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2723153&group_id=36855&atid=440764 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Midori
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Go mailing list
>>>> Go at geneontology.org
>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>>> 
>>> 
>
>