[Ontology-editors] [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms (fwd)

[Harold Drabkin]

please see my sf comment
I think the separate function terms may be more warranted than separate 
process terms

hd

David Hill wrote:
> OK, then just assign it to Tanya or me. We will do it as we do our 
> other SF items.
>
> David
>
> Midori Harris wrote:
>> In the SF comments we were leaning toward doing the merge and the F-P 
>> links at the same time (even though they don't have to be coupled), 
>> so I could still wait to do the merge.
>>
>> m
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>
>>> I think the merge is separate from the F-P links, so go ahead and 
>>> make the merge. We aren't up to this on the F-P links yet.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>> Yes, I understand that -- that's precisely what the plan has been 
>>>> for weeks. The question was, are we ready to do it? And if so, who 
>>>> does the editing? (I'm happy to but thought I'd see if you wanted 
>>>> to add it to the other MF-BP work.)
>>>>
>>>> m
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Midori,
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are specific function terms that describe the specific 
>>>>> amino acids, then these would just all become part_of the generic 
>>>>> parent.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember this? When we left it, we'd pretty much agreed to merge 
>>>>>> the amino-acid-specific process terms into the parent, as soon as 
>>>>>> we could also make part_of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tanya & David - would these MF-BP links fit in with the ones 
>>>>>> you're doing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> m
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:00:20 +0100 (BST)
>>>>>> From: Midori Harris <midori at ebi.ac.uk>
>>>>>> To: GO Mailing List <go at genome.stanford.edu>
>>>>>> Subject: [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear GO,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In SF 2723153, there is a proposal to merge the 
>>>>>> amino-acid-specific tRNA aminoacylation terms with the 
>>>>>> corresponding general parent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example, these two terms (and their siblings, omitted for 
>>>>>> brevity) would be merged with the parent GO:0006418 tRNA 
>>>>>> aminoacylation for protein translation:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   GO:0006419 alanyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>   GO:0006420 arginyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (The original request suggests obsoletion, but the proposal has 
>>>>>> been altered to merging.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would like to know whether there is broad support for this 
>>>>>> change, so please reply or comment on the SF item to say whether 
>>>>>> you think this is a good or bad idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2723153&group_id=36855&atid=440764 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Midori
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Go mailing list
>>>>>> Go at geneontology.org
>>>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>