[Ontology-editors] [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms (fwd)

Midori Harris midori at ebi.ac.uk
Wed Jun 24 09:12:12 PDT 2009


No one has ever proposed removing or changing the amino-acid-specific 
function terms.

m

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Harold Drabkin wrote:

> please see my sf comment
> I think the separate function terms may be more warranted than separate 
> process terms
>
> hd
>
> David Hill wrote:
>> OK, then just assign it to Tanya or me. We will do it as we do our other SF 
>> items.
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>> In the SF comments we were leaning toward doing the merge and the F-P 
>>> links at the same time (even though they don't have to be coupled), so I 
>>> could still wait to do the merge.
>>> 
>>> m
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I think the merge is separate from the F-P links, so go ahead and make 
>>>> the merge. We aren't up to this on the F-P links yet.
>>>> 
>>>> David
>>>> 
>>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I understand that -- that's precisely what the plan has been for 
>>>>> weeks. The question was, are we ready to do it? And if so, who does the 
>>>>> editing? (I'm happy to but thought I'd see if you wanted to add it to 
>>>>> the other MF-BP work.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> m
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Midori,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If there are specific function terms that describe the specific amino 
>>>>>> acids, then these would just all become part_of the generic parent.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> David
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Remember this? When we left it, we'd pretty much agreed to merge the 
>>>>>>> amino-acid-specific process terms into the parent, as soon as we could 
>>>>>>> also make part_of
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tanya & David - would these MF-BP links fit in with the ones you're 
>>>>>>> doing?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:00:20 +0100 (BST)
>>>>>>> From: Midori Harris <midori at ebi.ac.uk>
>>>>>>> To: GO Mailing List <go at genome.stanford.edu>
>>>>>>> Subject: [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dear GO,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In SF 2723153, there is a proposal to merge the amino-acid-specific 
>>>>>>> tRNA aminoacylation terms with the corresponding general parent.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For example, these two terms (and their siblings, omitted for brevity) 
>>>>>>> would be merged with the parent GO:0006418 tRNA aminoacylation for 
>>>>>>> protein translation:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   GO:0006419 alanyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>>   GO:0006420 arginyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (The original request suggests obsoletion, but the proposal has been 
>>>>>>> altered to merging.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We would like to know whether there is broad support for this change, 
>>>>>>> so please reply or comment on the SF item to say whether you think 
>>>>>>> this is a good or bad idea.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2723153&group_id=36855&atid=440764 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Midori
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Go mailing list
>>>>>>> Go at geneontology.org
>>>>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>


More information about the Ontology-editors mailing list