[Ontology-editors] [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms (fwd)

[Harold Drabkin]

justed wanted to be sure; had trouble following the thread at times..

Midori Harris wrote:
> No one has ever proposed removing or changing the amino-acid-specific 
> function terms.
>
> m
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Harold Drabkin wrote:
>
>> please see my sf comment
>> I think the separate function terms may be more warranted than 
>> separate process terms
>>
>> hd
>>
>> David Hill wrote:
>>> OK, then just assign it to Tanya or me. We will do it as we do our 
>>> other SF items.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>> In the SF comments we were leaning toward doing the merge and the 
>>>> F-P links at the same time (even though they don't have to be 
>>>> coupled), so I could still wait to do the merge.
>>>>
>>>> m
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think the merge is separate from the F-P links, so go ahead and 
>>>>> make the merge. We aren't up to this on the F-P links yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, I understand that -- that's precisely what the plan has been 
>>>>>> for weeks. The question was, are we ready to do it? And if so, 
>>>>>> who does the editing? (I'm happy to but thought I'd see if you 
>>>>>> wanted to add it to the other MF-BP work.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> m
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, David Hill wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Midori,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there are specific function terms that describe the specific 
>>>>>>> amino acids, then these would just all become part_of the 
>>>>>>> generic parent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Midori Harris wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Remember this? When we left it, we'd pretty much agreed to 
>>>>>>>> merge the amino-acid-specific process terms into the parent, as 
>>>>>>>> soon as we could also make part_of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tanya & David - would these MF-BP links fit in with the ones 
>>>>>>>> you're doing?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:00:20 +0100 (BST)
>>>>>>>> From: Midori Harris <midori at ebi.ac.uk>
>>>>>>>> To: GO Mailing List <go at genome.stanford.edu>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [Go] proposal to merge tRNA aminoacylation terms
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear GO,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In SF 2723153, there is a proposal to merge the 
>>>>>>>> amino-acid-specific tRNA aminoacylation terms with the 
>>>>>>>> corresponding general parent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example, these two terms (and their siblings, omitted for 
>>>>>>>> brevity) would be merged with the parent GO:0006418 tRNA 
>>>>>>>> aminoacylation for protein translation:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   GO:0006419 alanyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>>>   GO:0006420 arginyl-tRNA aminoacylation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (The original request suggests obsoletion, but the proposal has 
>>>>>>>> been altered to merging.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We would like to know whether there is broad support for this 
>>>>>>>> change, so please reply or comment on the SF item to say 
>>>>>>>> whether you think this is a good or bad idea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2723153&group_id=36855&atid=440764 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Midori
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Go mailing list
>>>>>>>> Go at geneontology.org
>>>>>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/go
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>