[Ontology-editors] [Chebi-ontology] Inference of GO BP relationships from CHEBI

Midori Harris midori at ebi.ac.uk
Mon Jun 29 01:57:07 PDT 2009



On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:

>
> On Jun 26, 2009, at 5:15 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
>
>> For the amine/amino/etc. terms, I wonder if the best fit between ChEBI and
>> GO might be:
>> 
>> GO:amine_metabolism =def GO:metabolism that has_participant
>> ChEBI:organic_amino_compound
>> 
>> ... even though the names don't quite match (we can edit the GO name and 
>> def). At a quick glance, the children of the ChEBI term cover everything 
>> currently grouped under amine metabolism in GO, and I didn't spot any 
>> children in GO that obviously wouldn't work with this.
>
> OK, that looks like it will work nicely.
>
> I'm not sure which of the is_a parents of amino acid in CHEBI would be 
> primary, organic amino compound or carboxylic acid.

urgh, it feels like a coin flip, but I'm leaning a bit towards organic 
amino compound. I'd feel better if I could pin down reasons why I think 
that ...

m



More information about the Ontology-editors mailing list