[Ontology-editors] [Chebi-ontology] Inference of GO BP relationships from CHEBI
Midori Harris
midori at ebi.ac.uk
Mon Jun 29 01:57:07 PDT 2009
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Chris Mungall wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2009, at 5:15 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
>
>> For the amine/amino/etc. terms, I wonder if the best fit between ChEBI and
>> GO might be:
>>
>> GO:amine_metabolism =def GO:metabolism that has_participant
>> ChEBI:organic_amino_compound
>>
>> ... even though the names don't quite match (we can edit the GO name and
>> def). At a quick glance, the children of the ChEBI term cover everything
>> currently grouped under amine metabolism in GO, and I didn't spot any
>> children in GO that obviously wouldn't work with this.
>
> OK, that looks like it will work nicely.
>
> I'm not sure which of the is_a parents of amino acid in CHEBI would be
> primary, organic amino compound or carboxylic acid.
urgh, it feels like a coin flip, but I'm leaning a bit towards organic
amino compound. I'd feel better if I could pin down reasons why I think
that ...
m
More information about the Ontology-editors
mailing list