[Ontology-editors] XP file

[Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark)]

Good thought. Maybe I could comment them out or something.

Jen

David Hill wrote:

> Perhaps there would be a way for you to tag the problematic stanzas so 
> that they won't be merged into the live ontology whne we do the cut -over.
> 
> David
> 
> Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The majority (about 650) of my XP stanzas in the bp-self file are 
>> nearly good to go. There are a bunch of others (about 100) that are 
>> going to be really difficult to fix and will need extensive 
>> rearrangements of the live structure.
>>
>> I would like to start to move my good stanzas to a file that is marked 
>> in some way as 'fully checked stanzas'. I feel as if the current 
>> policy of trying to fix all stanzas in a file before passing on the 
>> file is stopping the good stanzas from being used. The difficult terms 
>> that need work may take a *long* time, just because of the difficulty 
>> of the rearrangements and the current lack of support in OBO-Edit.
>>
>> I believe the current policy is that finished files will be moved to 
>> somewhere in go/ontology/. Would you be happy for me to make a bp-self 
>> file there and start to trickle-feed my fully checked stanzas into it? 
>> If so, then is there any preference for the location and naming scheme?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jennifer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
> 
> 

-- 
Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark)
EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute
Gene Ontology Consortium