[Ontology-editors] linking GO terms to docs

[Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark)]

Hi,

The new wording sounds good to me. I have tidied up the wiki page.
I will make further structural changes as it becomes clear how people 
want to contribute.

Jen


Midori Harris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think this idea is fine, but I have suggested a shorter wording for 
> the comment below. Even if you don't use most of it, please make sure 
> the comment starts with "note that" to be consistent with our 
> comment-writing guidelines.
> 
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The discussion to start overhauling the signaling terms is just 
>> starting to get going now and we would like to make sure all 
>> annotators are aware of this. Emily has suggested that we might put a 
>> pointer to the signaling wiki page into the comment field of the 
>> signal transduction terms to alert users to its existence. She says 
>> that this comment could then be cascaded down to the child terms by 
>> the various browser tools.
>>
>> If no one has any objections I will add a comment to signal 
>> transduction on Friday and it will say:
>>
>> "The signaling terms in GO are currently being overhauled. If you 
>> would like to read about the discussions, or contribute your ideas or 
>> thoughts please visit http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Signaling."
> 
> Note that the signaling terms in GO are currently being overhauled. More 
> information is available on the GO Consortium wiki at 
> http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Signaling.
> 
> m
> 
>>
>> I will also improve that page on the wiki so it is clear to people 
>> where to go to read about discussions and contribute ideas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>>