[Transport] [Ontology-editors] calcium ion transport question
Midori Harris
midori at ebi.ac.uk
Fri Feb 6 03:40:09 PST 2009
Thanks for the comments so far; looking forward to hearing more from the
transport experts.
I'm adding Varsha to the recipients so she can see what's happening (the
SF request that prompted this was hers).
m
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jennifer Deegan (nee Clark) wrote:
> Yes I agree. I think that the transport definition is very general and I'm in
> some doubt about how general it was intended to be, and whether we still
> stand by that intention. How 'directed' should the transport be, and do we
> really mean 'via, or with the assistance of a transporter protein complex'?
>
> I would be interested to hear whether the domain experts think that release
> of sequestered calcium ions into cytosol should count as directed. If the
> calcium ions had been transported from one location to another in vesicles,
> and then released, then I think that this could count as directed. However
> this def specifies that the ions are released from the endoplasmic reticulum
> or mitochondrion. This seems less directed, but I would like to have a better
> idea of the background of this process. Does anybody know off-hand?
>
> Does anybody else have any idea of how restrictive the transport terms were
> intended to be, or how restrictive they should be now? In our usual GO way, I
> could see the top transport term being general enough to capture all
> transport.
>
> Jen
>
>
>
> Chris Mungall wrote:
>> thought transport sensu GO meant *directed* movement.
>>
>> If I were to sneak into a zoo at night and unlock all the cages, would I be
>> directing all the monkeys and lions into the surrounding city? I guess it
>> depends on my intentions.
>>
>> I think it's similar here. There is a hidden notion of agency in the GO
>> definition of transport. Of course, cells have no intentions, but gene
>> products have evolved to carry out some role, so there is a form of agency
>> here. Even so it may be easier if describe processes rather than ascribing
>> goals.
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:00 AM, Midori Harris wrote:
>>
>>> just re-sending with a subject line ...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Midori Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone aware of any reason why 'release of sequestered calcium ion
>>>> into cytosol' (GO:0051209) has no relationship to 'calcium ion transport'
>>>> (GO:0006816)? If not, I think it would make sense to add.
>>>>
>>>> This came up as part of SF 2560505:
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2560505&group_id=36855&atid=440764
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Midori
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Transport mailing list
>>>> Transport at geneontology.org
>>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/transport
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ontology-editors mailing list
>> Ontology-editors at geneontology.org
>> http://fafner.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ontology-editors
>
More information about the Transport
mailing list